Have your say - sustainable land use
Land of suitable quality and fertility for food production needs to be zoned accordingly - total waste to be covered in mansions and ride on mowed lawns. Land is needed for housing, but should not occupy food growing areas.
Need to make it easier to get consent to build dams - water is not just an issue for the city.
1 0
The large scale spraying and burning of entire hillsides of native Kanuka needs to be regulated in this region. Untold millions of creatures go up in smoke instantly in the name of grass or pine trees, no one seems to bat an eye at this. So many birds, geckos and insects rely on these areas, it is no wonder populations are plummeting. At the very, very least it should be a rule that spraying is only allowed if there are large scrub areas nearby that can absorb some of the displaced wildlife (those that don't get incinerated). The irony is that often the subsequent erosion on the hills after scrub destruction results in more un-grazable areas due to slipping than if they had left the trees there. Often they are burning the only patch of scrub for miles, the hills are quite literally bare.
This region needs a balance of farmland and native areas for our wildlife, it needs to be regulated, at the moment it seems that people just do what they want with no thought to what they are destroying.
Please bring this up for discussion at a council meeting.
0 0
MAP
I am submitting in support of the Community Submission addressed to the Sustainable Land Use portion of the Tairawhiti Spatial Plan, 9th June.
0 0
What type of land uses are suitable for our steepest most erodible land? Only native forest.
Is plantation forestry in the right place? No, far too much of it on the steep and riparian land. keep it to the flats
What are the alternatives? regenerating/planting native trees
What is the cost of plantation forestry for Tairāwhiti? loss of biodiversity, poor water quality, poor roads, fatal accidents
Do we need more land protected for horticultural use?no
» How can we support the development of maori owned land? good consultation with hapu/iwi. We all have different ideas of development. Allowing native trees to regenerate is development.
2 0
Pines do not belong on our productive farm land the blanket planting which is occurring as a result of the Government's Billion Trees incentives. Our communities will suffer, have we not learnt from the past...just look at the East Coast for example 30-40 years ago the East Coast was thriving, bustling employment rich communities, planting pines on fertile rolling country has contributed to the ghost towns which line the Coast, the state of the roads and not to mention the 'slash' situation. The 'Well-being' of our communities are under threat, a farm can employ, house, feed, nurture and educate multiple families over generations. Rural Schools rely on rural families working on farms. Forestry has its place, but its not on fertile farm land. Once a farm is planted thats it for 30 years, yes it employs people for a couple of months while it is planted, prunned then there is nothing until it is felled carted and sold, do the profits go back into the community??? No...they go off offshore. If forestry was so good for communities wouldnt they be thriving??? Instead the East Coast have some of the worse health and well-being stats in NZ!!!! I'm hoping something can be done here in Tairawhiti in regards to this. I hope its not to late!!! Rural communities is what makes this region soo unique.
5 0
Tell us what you think
If your message is larger than 250 words click here
  • Loading

Attach files by dropping them in here, or you can also browse your device

Your browser does not support HTML5 uploads. Please update to a newer version.

Latest Submission
Pines do not belong on our productive farm land the blanket planting which is occurring as a result of the Government's Billion Trees incentives. Our communities will suffer, have we not learnt from the past...just look at the East Coast for example 30-40 years ago the East Coast was thriving, bustling employment rich communities, planting pines on fertile rolling country has contributed to the ghost towns which line the Coast, the state of the roads and not to mention the 'slash' situation. The 'Well-being' of our communities are under threat, a farm can employ, house, feed, nurture and educate multiple families over generations. Rural Schools rely on rural families working on farms. Forestry has its place, but its not on fertile farm land. Once a farm is planted thats it for 30 years, yes it employs people for a couple of months while it is planted, prunned then there is nothing until it is felled carted and sold, do the profits go back into the community??? No...they go off offshore. If forestry was so good for communities wouldnt they be thriving??? Instead the East Coast have some of the worse health and well-being stats in NZ!!!! I'm hoping something can be done here in Tairawhiti in regards to this. I hope its not to late!!! Rural communities is what makes this region soo unique.
5 0